《电子技术应用》
您所在的位置:首页 > 人工智能 > 设计应用 > 面向风险的人工智能监管进展、创新与启示:基于欧盟视角的观察
面向风险的人工智能监管进展、创新与启示:基于欧盟视角的观察
网络安全与数据治理
王春晓,李怀胜
中国政法大学刑事司法学院
摘要: 随着人工智能技术发展和市场化应用下的风险衍化,人工智能监管产生并独立于人工智能治理,成为化解人工智能风险的基础理念与新兴领域。欧盟首创面向风险的人工智能监管新范式,并借助国际合作、伦理约束与风险监管框架等方式实现欧盟人工智能监管的领导力和行动力。考虑到人工智能技术与社会需求的参差,欧盟优化人工智能监管主体、监管流程以及监管内容以达到人工智能动态风险的有效监管。面对复杂的人工智能风险态势,我国可借鉴欧盟经验,在政策决定层面,基于本土国情制定面向风险的人工智能法律政策与框架体系;在应用实践层面,构建司法机关、市场监督机关以及企业等主体的交互协同机制;在产业结构层面,通过市场赋能推动人工智能监管职能下沉和产业创新发展;在通识教育层面,培育人工智能素养作为防范人工智能风险的监管“安全阀”,实现公正、和谐和创新的未来人工智能发展。
中图分类号:TP18;D912.1文献标识码:ADOI:10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2024.11.015引用格式:王春晓,李怀胜.面向风险的人工智能监管进展、创新与启示:基于欧盟视角的观察[J].网络安全与数据治理,2024,43(11):92-100.
Risk-oriented artificial intelligence regulation: progress, innovation and inspiration from the European Union perspective
Wang Chunxiao,Li Huaisheng
School of Criminal Justice, China University of Political Science and Law
Abstract: As artificial intelligence technology advances and market application risks evolve, artificial intelligence regulation has emerged and been independent of artificial intelligence governance, which has become the basic concept and emerging field of resolving artificial intelligence risks. The European Union has pioneered a new paradigm of risk-oriented AI regulation, and realized the leadership and action of EU AI regulation by means of international cooperation, ethical constraints and risk regulation framework. Considering the difference between artificial intelligence technology and social needs, the EU should optimize the main body, regulatory process and regulatory content of artificial intelligence to achieve the effective regulation of artificial intelligence risks. Faced with the complex risk situation of artificial intelligence, China can learn from the experience of the European Union, and formulate the risk-oriented legal policy and framework system of artificial intelligence based on local national conditions at the policy decision-making level. At the level of application and practice, an interactive and collaborative mechanism among judicial organs, market supervision organs and enterprises is constructed. At the industrial structure level, the market empowerment was used to promote the sinking of artificial intelligence regulatory functions and the development of industrial innovation. At the level of general education, it fosters artificial intelligence literacy as a Security Valve of regulation to mitigate risks associated with artificial intelligence, and realizes the fair, harmonious and innovative future development of artificial intelligence.
Key words : artificial intelligence regulation; European Union; Artificial Intelligence Act; artificial intelligence risk

引言

随着人工智能系统普遍嵌入数字经济产业,其引发的算法偏见、数据隐私、伦理失范等潜在风险也接踵而至。正如联合国教科文组织(United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO)在《人工智能伦理建议书》所说,人工智能可以对人类大有裨益并惠及全球,但也可能加剧偏见而导致算法歧视、数字鸿沟和数字互斥,威胁文化、社会和生物多样性并造成社会经济失衡。与此同时,该文件将人工智能监管视为人工智能风险的解决之道,鼓励各国政府采用人工智能监管(Artificial Intelligence Regulation,AI Regulation)以预测后果、减少风险、避免有害后果、促进公民参与和应对社会挑战[1]。在此背景下,欧盟逐步意识到人工智能风险引起的监管需求,构建起人工智能监管范式并创新政策体系和实践举措,逐渐成为世界人工智能监管领域的重要一极。

镜鉴欧盟人工智能监管的先进经验对中国的人工智能监管改革、发展和变革具有重要的意义和作用。本文为明确欧盟人工智能监管的领域界分,首先在理论基础上对人工智能监管与人工智能治理(Artificial Intelligence Governance,AI Governance)进行区分和对比,明晰欧盟面向风险的人工智能监管的范式变革。其次,从欧盟最新出台的《人工智能法案》(下称《法案》)入手,分析欧盟面向风险的人工智能监管理论与实践动向,以展现欧盟在人工智能监管领域的先进举措。最后,结合欧盟人工智能监管理论创新和实践经验,为我国人工智能监管发展提供有益借鉴。


本文详细内容请下载:

https://www.chinaaet.com/resource/share/2000006235


作者信息:

王春晓,李怀胜

(中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088)


Magazine.Subscription.jpg

此内容为AET网站原创,未经授权禁止转载。